This was prompted by a comment in my blog from Dave McCoy, a long time contributor:
‘As always I am struck by the irony that “leaders” rarely show the qualities they expect in their staff…’
Let me know what you think.
This is something I have seen more often than I can count and I imagine you have too. But Dave’s point is why is it the case?
I think there are six main reasons:
- Lack of awareness
- Not taking responsibility
- Poor feedback
- No example to follow
- Lack of training
- Poor recruitment
Let me start with a short story. I was at the sixtieth birthday party (yes, another party) of a friend recently. He is from Jamaica and told a great story about one of the people who influenced him in his life. It was his grandmother.
One day she said to him:
‘You’d better get yourself an education, man.’ He paused and we all held our breath as we waited for her words of wisdom, so we could pass them on to our own children.
‘Coz you’re USELESS!’ he bellowed, impersonating the great lady.
‘You can’t even climb a tree like your brother…’ The tirade continued.
I was stunned, as was the rest of the audience. Then we all laughed. It was this piece of feedback that had prompted our friend to pull up his socks and, eventually, get a good education.
Sadly many leaders do not have as perceptive a grandmother as our friend did.
None Of Us Is As Self-Aware As We Could Be
This is the first reason, I think. No matter how skilled we are, there are faults we have that we are blind to.
It’s Worse For Leaders
However, most of us have the benefit of the odd piece of feedback from friends and family, or even colleagues.
How we respond to that feedback determines how much feedback we get in the future and whether it is reliable.
Unfortunately for leaders, the quality and objectivity of the feedback they get is often dubious. The paradox is that the worse their skills are the less likely they are to be given objective feedback (and to act on it).
This is because people are frightened to give them feedback or don’t have the skills themselves. The reason they don’t have the skills is because they have not been developed by their managers (because the managers don’t have the skills….)
Blame The Middle Managers
Many times we have heard of swathes of ‘middle managers’ being cut from an organisation that has become ‘top heavy’. In the health service in particular people are always concerned that the money goes ‘directly to the patients’, not to bureaucracy which, to them, is ‘middle management’.
But you must ask yourself: Who appointed all the middle managers? Who decided they were necessary? Who identified the skills required and drew up the organisational plans?
Yes, it was the senior managers. The ones who are so often immune from the cuts.
Why Don’t They Realise It’s Their Fault?
If you have children you will be familiar with the difficulty of choosing a school. Even when you’ve got a good one, if the head or principal changes, you know the school will too.
Like any organisation, the school is only as good as the person at the top.
The problem for the person at the top is that they have no example to follow. Whereas people lower down the chain can raise their game, can learn from their manager and be inspired to greater things by them, this option is not automatically open to someone at the top.
They have to make a conscious effort to do it. And many don’t. It simply doesn’t occur to them.
As a consequence of this, they do not improve their skills and this lack of development is cascaded down the organisation to the detriment of all.
Why Don’t They Go On The Training Courses Like Everyone Else?
They have lots of excuses but I think the main reason is fear. They don’t want to be found out.
One of the most successful programmes I have ever run was successful because the Managing Director (a man who had several glaring faults) insisted that all employees went through the programme and that included the directors.
We had one director on each module. Initially this was a struggle for some of the people there (not just the directors). But it soon started to work. They just mucked in with everyone else and the benefits were tremendous.
The Benefits
During a time of recession we increased orders and market share, whilst halving the number of complaints received. (Their competitors all made cuts in staffing levels.) Having the directors on the programme meant that they knew what everyone was talking about and got help in implementing the new ideas.
It’s no good keeping them separate in some ivory tower so they can be allowed to imagine they don’t need to learn new skills.
Recruitment
Perhaps one last reason why you get this problem is the poor recruitment processes often used at senior levels. This can include badly drawn up person specifications so that the management skills required are given a very low priority if any value at all.
The worst case of this I saw was a man, apparently a ‘technical expert in his field’, who had previously been in academia and was recruited to run a massive department. Before this he had managed one secretary.
The HR representative warned the directors not to recruit him due to his appalling level of management skills but they ignored her advice. I was asked in much later to see what I could do to retrieve the situation. By then the damage had been done and it was far too late. I’m sorry to say that he was not able to learn the skills he needed to master in time; it would have taken years.
Looking at this list, perhaps it’s surprising that we have any skilled people at the top at all! But I think if they are prepared to accept the salary, they should be prepared to learn the skills and this should be made clear to them at the start. The trouble is, the rest of us let them get away with it.