First, Some Chocolate
I came across some research recently from the researcher, Dr Matthew D Lieberman of the University of California was asking the question; ‘Does fairness taste like chocolate?’
As a keen consumer of chocolate, I was very interested in the answer.
It turns out that, in the language of neuroscience, fairness does taste like chocolate in that you get a very similar response in the brain from eating chocolate and from being treated fairly. An area called the ventral striatum is activated and this makes you feel happy. And in this way we are motivated to get fair treatment. (There is also a part of your brain that is activated when it experiences unfair treatment, but I don’t know if it’s activated by poor quality chocolate.)
Is It Really Better To Give Than Receive?
The next question Dr Lieberman went on to ask was: ‘Is the reward in the brain for giving greater than that for receiving?’ To answer this question he turned to some research by Jorge Moll et al.
It turns out that it is better to give than to receive as far as your brain is concerned. (Though, for your information, I do love to receive chocolate…) But interestingly, your ability to predict how you will feel about it is not good. So people don’t realise how good they are likely to feel when they give something to others.
The Secret of Happiness
This reminded me of some research on happiness I shared with the very small group of readers who were getting the early version of Grapevine back in 2002. If you got that, I hope you don’t mind me duplicating this information at the end of this issue for those who didn’t.
Meeting Simon
After one of my workshops in Wessex I was approached by Simon Barnes. He was very excited and said that our ideas on objectives and performance management were very much in alignment.
He then went on to tell me that he was developing some web-based Performance Appraisal software and wondered if I would have a look at it and give him some feedback.
I did have a look and I gave him lots of feedback. When we next got together I was delighted to see that he had implemented all of my suggestions.
Why This Is a Good Idea
Ultimately, because it saves you money, time and effort and can make you more money too. Here’s why.
In my view, paper performance management systems can be a pain because updating them is such a hassle. This is inefficient and time-consuming. If you have a web-based system that works properly everyone can see what’s going on and keep up to date.
Every employee should be able to easily see the objectives that their objectives cascade from so they know their part in the whole. This also makes vertical alignment much easier.
This helps the company as a whole to be much more focussed on the objectives and what needs to be achieved. This in turn makes it much more likely that the company or organisation will achieve its objectives (watch out for more issues on this topic and related research coming soon).
A Version For Smaller Companies
One of my suggestions at our second meeting was that Simon could develop a smaller version for smaller companies that would be simple and easy to use, yet still give them the benefits of such a system.
Well, that system is now almost ready and I reviewed it last week. Just yesterday we got together again. It’s not quite perfect yet, which is why Simon needs one or two small companies (10-15 employees) to pilot the new software. He is offering a year’s free use of the system to a company that is willing to help.
Your Opportunity To Help (And Feel Good Into The Bargain)
I suggested that Grapevine readers would undoubtedly be the best candidates for this (yes, that’s you).
My one concern was that not all those who apply will get the pilot opportunity and they would miss out on this special offer (which would not be fair). Simon has very kindly agreed that any company that just offers its services to pilot the system will get three months free usage, with no obligation at all.
To find out more use this link
http://www.vinehouse.co.uk/contact.htm
or call Charlie on +44 (0) 1483 811413 by 14th April.
The Software
Just to let you know that this is a web based system that will enable you to keep track of objectives and your progress against them. It will also help with alignment of objectives and be full of tips from me on how to write your objectives and how to carry out performance reviews.
If you use it properly your performance reviews and appraisals should be virtually written and agreed before you carry them out (which is how it’s really meant to be).
I will be personally writing and vetting all the information that comes with the system (I won’t be doing the difficult software bit, though; they have experts doing that).
For those who sign up (it will be on a monthly fee basis) there will also be discounts on all our products here at Vinehouse.
Chocolate and Giving
So now you have the opportunity to give and so do I! And I must say I feel good about it already.
Now for the research on Happiness. Though this is from a few years ago, I think you will still find it to be very interesting, if not useful.
Why is The Secret of Happiness still a Secret?
Daniel T. Gilbert Ph.D. Professor of Psychology Chair Program in Social Psychology, Faculty, Social Cognitive and Emotion Laboratory, Harvard University.
According to Dr Gilbert’s research our skills at predicting how we will feel as the result of various events can be very poor. We tend to think that we will feel worse than we really will, so as a result we often make decisions that will make us unhappy, thinking they will make us happy.
Is it better to make a quick decision or to think about it?
Dr Gilbert designed an experiment where students were offered a course in photography. At the end of the course, each student made large glossy prints of their two favourite photos. They were then given the opportunity to take just one of them home. The students in Group A were given seven minutes to make the decision. Those in Group B were told to take their time and that if they changed their mind when they got home they had four days to change the photo.
After a week, all the students were asked how happy they were with their photo choice. Group A was the happiest. Group B was unhappy (even though none of them had changed their photograph).
How good are you at making yourself happy?
A further experiment was carried out where students were offered a photography course. They were told about the course (identical to the one above) and that there were two options: Option A where you would have seven minutes to choose your favourite photo to take home and could not change it. Option B where you had four days to make up your mind on your favourite photo and would be able to change it at any stage during those four days.
Most people chose Option B – the option that would make them unhappy.
Implications:
Question whether giving yourself lots of time to review decisions and change your mind is really going to help, especially in areas that are not important. It will make you unhappy with a choice you would otherwise have been perfectly happy with.
Be careful about allowing people longer than necessary to make up their minds – you may have to deal with the consequences.
Theory
Our ability to predict effectively how we will feel depends on various factors, many that we often forget or are unaware of.
One simple factor is that there will be other events in our life that will mitigate some of our feelings. Another is our ‘psychological immune system’. For example, if we don’t get something we want we often tell ourselves it wasn’t that wonderful anyway (sour grapes). This is a very effective strategy and we tend to ignore its power.
If you are dating a person and they exhibit bad table manners, we might decide not to see them again. However, if you are already married to them we would tend to say things like
“He earns a lot of money.” Or
“She has a good sense of humour.” Or
“He never does it in public.”
All of which mitigate the problem.
From the research it seems that once we have committed to a course of action, we tend to be happier with it.
Is being happy a skill?
Richard J Davidson
William James and Vilas Research Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry. Directors of the WM Keck Laboratory for Functional Brain Imaging and Behaviour, Laboratory for Affective Neuroscience, the NIMH-funded Wisconsin Center for Affective Sciences, The Center for Mind-body Interaction, and the NIMH Training program in Emotion Research. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Do you achieve all your goals? Or just some of them?
One of the keys to achieving our goals is the emotion we feel when we are thinking about the goal. To feel motivated to achieve a goal you need to have the right emotions. This can make it less likely that we achieve it.
Some people are able to shrug off negative feelings. For others, negative emotions stay with them for a long time. This affects their perception and the way they think about their goals.
Richard Davidson believes this is a skill that can be learnt. He also thinks that early exposure to negative or positive stimuli can affect our abilities in this area.
Research shows that the side of the brain that is activated when we think about things has an effect on how positively or negatively we think about an issue. The right side of the brain is linked with negative thoughts and the left with positive.
Implications
If you want to achieve something, you need to think about it in the positive – as what you do want, rather than what you don’t want.
When you are learning, the way you think about what you learn affects how much you learn and how well you learn it.
It may be that we can train ourselves to view the world more positively. Dr Davidson is currently looking at methods that are already used, such as various forms of meditation, to see how they change the brain.
At the very least, when we are helping others to learn, one of the first things to do is to help them to access feelings of interest and excitement about the topic. This makes it easier to learn.
Theory
There are different emotions attached to the anticipation of a goal and the achievement of a goal. People who are depressed seem less able to access the anticipatory emotions. In order to start on a achieving a goal, you need to access these feelings (excitement, optimism, inspiration and interest for example.)
From PET scans Dr Davidson and his associates have identified that, depending on which side of our brain we use, we have a more positive or negative view of the world.
When parts of the right frontal lobe are activated, we tend to see the glass as “half empty”. When the left frontal lobe is activated, we tend to see it as “half full”.
If people are shown pictures that are negative in content, the right frontal lobes become active. If they are then shown other more neutral stimuli they then tend to see these in a negative light too – because the right side of the brain remains more active. Some people are able to recover from this bias more quickly than others.
It has been known for a long time that learning a physical skill changes the brain. If you play the violin the part of your brain which controls the fingers of the left hand becomes larger. Dr Davidson thinks the same is true for mental skills. So by exercising these mental skills we can change our brains and become better at being more positive.
To take part in the pilot contact us using this link
http://www.vinehouse.co.uk/contact.htm
or call Charlie on +44 (0) 1483 811413 by 14th April.